Annette, I get that you are upset about your breeder but I know at least a couple of individuals on that list that do not have adequate reasons to be on there except personal agendas. I also know members on both boards (CCAA & ICCF) that should be on a banned list, I know members of both clubs that because they are "big names" they will never be banned.
AKC is a REGISTRY, they are a corporation that is based off making their bottom line. They do not control standards, they do not control if a breeder breeds dogs that do not meet standard, that have temperament issues, etc. I know several breeders of merit that are fantastic people and several I would not give the time of day to.
ICCF is a REGISTRY, they do the same thing the AKC does to make their bottom line. The ICCF club is a separate entity and their members and officers and they are the ones that put individuals/kennels on the banned list.
CCAA and ICCF both have a "recommended" breeders page, do you know how you get on either of them? PAY... there are no checks to ensure they are following breeding practices.
There are breeders on both those lists that do not health test, breed dogs not to standard, have dogs they have never done a thing with outside of breeding. It comes down to research and not relying on someone else's stamp of approval to ensure you are getting a quality dog. I get more emails than I know what to do with, asking questions from individuals that previously told me my puppies were too expensive or that I didn't have them when they wanted them. They found ones faster, cheaper, etc. and then I get the calls because their breeders weren't what they thought they were. There is no replacement for research and taking the time to talk to a breeder and those with dogs from that breeder, good and bad.