chuckorlando
Well-Known Member
I sure would DD. But It suspect it would be one of those one session trainings. He turns the corner, she goes at him like a gorilla on meth, he runs back his car. ahahahahaha.
Masteno I know many of fools like that. That old saying "more than one way to skin a cat" comes to mind. I mean that aint to say that there aint some science out there that say's this works faster, slower, or what have you. But if it works for a person, whats it matter.... I know farm dogs aint never been in a house a day in their life, never been trained a day in their life, and it would amaze some folks what they get out of em. In fact my wifes uncle has hound, cur, and a pit that are as wild as it gets far as training goes. Old tink wistles all them boys come running. They bust the gate on the truck and you'll have a hog in 30min. If he points, the dog goes. No doubt this would'nt work for everyone or even him with every dog, but it works now....
I just dont subscribe to the one size fits all. Even in the same realm of discussion. Like guarding. There is no one type dog to fit all us. There is no single way to train it, or no single expectation to be had. 99% of us will never need anything but a show at the front door. Period. Or the look of any of these when outside.
And now that I know what the OP is talking about here... Is there anything wrong with your dog being friendly and still protective to what ever degree? Absolutly not. The problem in that thread was simply the dude who started it. When you try to make others feel like they dont know what there doing, or your better, or like you have done originaly here, and make it seem some of our dog choices are foolish, well it pisses folks off. When you piss folks off who deal with dogs that work of natrual drive, or folks like DD who have a huge respect for those type dogs, it gets rough ahahahaha. Dogs mirror the owners. Rough dogs mean rough owner. Plus, dude was just disrespecting folks I respect. Just like I would in person, Im gonna have their back and I might just be an intentional ass in the process. Cause I own a rough dog. ahahahahahaha
Masteno I know many of fools like that. That old saying "more than one way to skin a cat" comes to mind. I mean that aint to say that there aint some science out there that say's this works faster, slower, or what have you. But if it works for a person, whats it matter.... I know farm dogs aint never been in a house a day in their life, never been trained a day in their life, and it would amaze some folks what they get out of em. In fact my wifes uncle has hound, cur, and a pit that are as wild as it gets far as training goes. Old tink wistles all them boys come running. They bust the gate on the truck and you'll have a hog in 30min. If he points, the dog goes. No doubt this would'nt work for everyone or even him with every dog, but it works now....
I just dont subscribe to the one size fits all. Even in the same realm of discussion. Like guarding. There is no one type dog to fit all us. There is no single way to train it, or no single expectation to be had. 99% of us will never need anything but a show at the front door. Period. Or the look of any of these when outside.
And now that I know what the OP is talking about here... Is there anything wrong with your dog being friendly and still protective to what ever degree? Absolutly not. The problem in that thread was simply the dude who started it. When you try to make others feel like they dont know what there doing, or your better, or like you have done originaly here, and make it seem some of our dog choices are foolish, well it pisses folks off. When you piss folks off who deal with dogs that work of natrual drive, or folks like DD who have a huge respect for those type dogs, it gets rough ahahahaha. Dogs mirror the owners. Rough dogs mean rough owner. Plus, dude was just disrespecting folks I respect. Just like I would in person, Im gonna have their back and I might just be an intentional ass in the process. Cause I own a rough dog. ahahahahahaha